Quote:
Originally Posted by LongSufferingToady
I don't care about Clay. Nor do I care about Nate. But naming a "respected" journalist without sources is just as bad as using a non-journalist without sources. Neither named names. Neither identified. So who should I believe?
There's truth in both of them. There's a lot of fantasy in Clay's post as well. You can't just throw out posts you don't like. Neither can I.
|
I love how you've basically convinced yourself that Clay and actual journalists are on the same plain.
Are you familiar with the false equivalence fallacy? Here's a refresher:
Quote:
|
A simple example of a false equivalence is saying that a knife and dynamite are both tools that can be used as weapons, so they're pretty much the same thing, and therefore if we allow people to buy knives at the store, then we should also allow them to also buy dynamite.
|