Quote:
Originally Posted by JudasRising20
Hakeem didn't win the title with Sampson. I was talking about 1994 and 1995. That's a fair point about Drexler. However, there's no doubt who was top dog on that team. It wasn't Drexler. Shaq was better than Kobe during their runs, but Kobe was more likely to have the ball in key moments.
In any case, Shaq never had a run like 1994 where Hakeem had no Drexler and carried that team.
|
Shaq didn't win the title with Penny. You brought him up first. You're changing the goal posts, not me.
Shaq was clearly the Lakers' dominant player in the NBA Finals.
Shaq
2000 NBA Finals: 38.0 PPG/16.7 RPG/2.3 APG, .611 FG%
2001 NBA Finals: 33.0 PPG/15.8 RPG/4.8 APG, .573 FG%
2002 NBA Finals: 36.3 PPG/12.3 RPG/3.8 APG, .595 FG%
2004 NBA Finals: 26.6 PPG/10.8 RPG/1.6 APG, .631 FG%
Kobe
2000 NBA Finals: 15.6 PPG/4.6 RPG/4.2 APG, .367 FG%
2001 NBA Finals: 24.6 PPG/7.8 RPG/5.8 APG, .415 FG%
2002 NBA Finals: 26.8 PPG/5.8 RPG/5.3 APG, .514 FG%
2004 NBA Finals: 22.6 PPG/2.8 RPG/4.4 APG, .381 FG%