Quote:
Originally Posted by penchief
This isn’t about social injustice, Martyball, or even a cult of Kareem Hunt. To me, it’s about how scary ****ing good that offense was when Hunt was bouncing off tacklers and bowling people over. It’s the difference between having impactful play at that position versus not.
That said, I fully agree with Clark’s decision to cut Hunt loose. All I want to see happen is for the chiefs to somehow replace that punishing running game. To me, that would be far more impactful than our coveted upgrade at WR2.
|
This is an extremely interesting take to me.
I mean, in the AFC CG vs Cincy, our backs were averaging almost 5 ypc and have over 100 yard cumulatively in the first half.
Andy Reid still wouldn't hand them the ball. Same shit happened in the 2014 Colts playoff loss and 2018 Titans playoff loss...wouldn't matter if we had Walter ****ing Payton in his prime if Reid refuses to run the ball. My $.02.