Quote:
Originally Posted by FAX
No offense, Mr. chiefforlife ...
But FA running backs are a no-go for me.
The cost/value proposition is historically unfavorable. (Priest Holmes notwithstanding.
FAX
|
I'd argue it's been pretty favorable for us. Probably because we didn't spend a lot of money there.
But when you can draft a starter every year in the 3rd - 5th round why bother? I get it. I still think you roll the dice on a Barkely or Taylor or generational guy.