Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
I...uh...DID outright say it.
Why do you suppose I said "I think...."
I don't know if the sun will rise tomorrow, sport.
What the hell is with you people who think deigning to have a conversation on a topic is an affront to your honor?
Y'all are odd.
Of course it's speculation. I don't need to start my post with "In my opinion..." Of course it's my opinion - I'm the one friggen writing it.
Would you feel better if I put some sort of disclaimer in my sig block clarifying that I am not some form of omniscient deity? Would that help clear matters up for you?
|
I think I am right in saying you wanted more of a deep threat burner type? If I am confused and thats not you, you may as well disregard the below...
I think the bigger factor in the whole "teams playing the two high shell against the Chiefs" is actually the Chiefs defense improving. Its easy to let the Chiefs matriculate via the running/short passing game in close games, but if the defense comes out and puts a team in a double digit hole, can they really sit in a passive two high shell and let the Chiefs bleed the clock with methodical drives?
I think I sort of agree with you, that a possession type receiver won't get teams out of the two high looks, but I don't really think another burner would either. I'm fine with JuJu - Its not an exciting signing but thats a very solid 3rd target, its more receiving talent than last year and more talent is all the Chiefs offense needs