Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
I'd take that to heart more if I didn't honestly mean my assessments, and if you actually rebutted them with countervailing facts.
When you characterize my perspective as condescending, it pretty much concedes that your gripe isn't so much that I'm wrong, but that I'm right and it's unpleasant to think about.
You are disgusted with a realistic view of the situation, but you transfer that disgust to my frankness.
And frankly, doxxing is about the most disgusting disappointing, . . . wait for it, . . . passive-aggressive, strategy I've seen anyone take.
This has been a disappointing development in a slow drip of disappointing developments, and the rebuttal has been 'everything is fine, so long as Mahomes.' And all I observe is that there isn't a lot of elevate the franchise outside Mahomes, and somehow that's heresy.
But yeah, I'm all alone in kookoo land
|
Perhaps I wasn’t clear about this:
The only reason I’m saying anything is because you’re wrong and you’ve been wrong about this team and it’s makeup since the day Patrick Mahomes was drafted. You have a problem with building around a drafted QB for some absurd reason AND you’re condescending and passive aggressive about it.
I give you rep comments about a great many things including football takes.
The only time I engage you like this is when you, once again, go in your stupid diatribes about team building and passively aggressively suggesting that those of us who wanted Mahomes are somehow now getting what we deserve. Don’t pretend that’s not what you’re doing either - MANY people have seen it, not just me.