Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise
Except everyone is talking about taking him at 29 or 30.
|
well, I don't know about EVERYONE.
I'd take him at 50.
What I'm getting at is an attitude of 'THIS KID SUCKS, HE'S TERRIBLE, HE'S TOTAL SHIT AND WOULD BE A HUGE MISTAKE AT 3O! But I might take him at 62.
I mean, come on man.
It's hyperbole. It's irrational.
You might feel like 30 is a reach, but it's not absurd. Hell, I think it's a reach, and I like the kid.