Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox
The following players are listed by Pro Football Reference as having a similar "quality and shape of career" after 6 years:
Let's remove from comparison players from different eras: Charlie Johnson, Brian Sipe, John Hadl, Terry Bradshaw, Don Meredith, Doug Williams, and Tommy Kramer. If anyone thinks all of these players should be considered as comparisons to Kaepernick, let me know.
That leaves:
Marcus Mariotta, similar after 6, has played for 7 and is under contract for year 8 in 2022.
Carson Wentz, similar after 6, while he is not a star, no one thinks he should not be under contract for his 7th year.
Blake Bortles, similar after 6, but was under contract for 8.He could still be under contract for his 9th year in 2022.
Now let's expand to QBs with similar "quality and shape" for their entire careers. To Mariota, Wentz and Bortles we will now add Jay Fiedler (9 year career), Scott Mitchell (11 year career), Jameis Winston (7+ year career), David Carr(11 year career), Stan Humphries (9 year career), Elvis Grbac (8 year career), and Kyle Orton (10 year career).
It's absolutely clear that Kaepernick's performance was strong enough during his first 6 years to warrant being under contract during his 7th year. His case for being excluded from playing in the NFL in years since as a direct result of his decision to speak up against racial injustice is undisputable. It's your privilege to believe differently.
|
First, those guys don't **** where they eat.
Second, he elected to become a free agent and he wanted a starting job and a starter's salary or he probably would have ended up in Denver.
It seems his ego didn't allow him to accept salary commensurate to his talent and play, and he wasn't willing to fight for a starting job. He made his bed.
This nonsense that, at age 34, a guy who wasn't very good in the first place and whose game relied entirely on mobility would be good in the league after a 6 year absence is silly.