Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
Yeah but that shows you how limited he is. If GB could mix it up a bit so they weren't wasting a down 51% of the time they threw it to him, don't you think they would have?
I'd rather have Skyy who can seemingly catch at every level at high percentage than 1 that can only catch at 1 level at a low percentage. For that reason I think Skyy will quickly move up the depth chart this season.
|
Man, you just don't grasp anything beyond surface level observation.
Just because Green Bay used him as a deep threat pretty exclusively doesn't mean he's necessarily 'limited'. 49% catch rate on deep balls is not bad, really either.
If Green Bay wanted to design their offense to push the ball to Adams, and used MVS to help do so, that only means that they wanted to push the ball to Adams.
Doesn't say much about MVS other than they preferred the ball in Adams' hands.
That's not how Andy Reid's offenses are designed, although it's not all that different in how it played out with Hill.
It's not a great stretch to think that perhaps Andy Reid can get a bit more out of a WR than Matt Lafleur.
By all accounts, MVS is working hard and showing the ability to run a much more complete route tree than he did in GB.
No need to put the kid in a box until we actually see him play, in this offense, with Mahomes.