Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRedChief
who cares about a player shaves off a couple of years on the resume? So the team pays that much more for two years younger? The print more money Angels?
Pujols was an established star. The Angels knew what they were getting. **** the Angels anyway. We never get to see one of the best players of this generation play on TV or in the playoffs because their front office is incompetent.
We fans got to see the best 11 year run a player has ever had. Better than Ruth, Mantle, Griffey etc. we started to see the aging taking hold. Everyone did. He still was one of the top players of the current game but no longer HOF level of play.
|
One of the best players of this generation? Man, Aaron Judge or Yordan Alvarez is "one of" the best players "of this generation".
Mike Trout is THE best player of ALL generations ever.
Get that right and then we can talk about a guy that everyone knew even in his amateur days was way older than he claimed. There is a scene in the movie 'Benchwarmers' that directly clowns on Pujols himself. Pujols should definitely be a first ballot HOFer if you mean Hall of Frauds.
But we can never discuss Pujols if you have that much disrespect and vitriol in you about Trout.