Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
Or…hear me out here…Carlos Dunlap?
Yeah. That’ll do. And a first rd pick. And Mike Danna playing really well.
These old guys like JPP, Ingram and Dunlap shouldn’t be getting a ton of snaps like a starter anymore. They’ve got about 10 years worth of being banged up. Don’t think it’s sustainable for a 17 game season.
Again. Karlaftis and Danna both got 6 pressures week 1 and our DL got 18 last Thursday. That’s top 5 in the league guys.
So what are we complaining about again?
|
Why do you keep deflecting?
Because every single thing you mentioned - literally every one of them - is a WHOLLY independent analysis from Frank Clark. None of them are impacted by his presence on the roster.
Cut Frank Clark - can still sign Dunlap. Cut Frank Clark - can still draft George Karlaftis. Cut Frank Clark - Mike Danna still develops in the off-season.
Keeping Frank Clark did NOTHING to impact those things. He's done nothing to make them easier. He's done nothing to make them more substantial. Having Frank Clark on this roster has done jack and shit and will only make things HARDER next season.
Again - I'm just a little confused by your insistence on being obtuse here. You know exactly what everyone is saying. You know they're not just 'bitching to bitch' and that Frank Clark didn't have anything to do with the rest of the things you've cited.
So what the hell are you trying to accomplish here? Is your point that people should stop pointing out that Frank Clark ****ing Sucks in a thread titled "Frank Clark ****ing Sucks"?
Because that seems...Quixotic.