Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meck
If we still had Hill, it would be the 2021 version of Hill, which was a 11 ypc WR, because defenses were going to drop 7 on every play and absolutely not allow the explosive play.
Which makes Hill not worth that kind of money. Which is why we traded him.
Now, defenses are still doing that, and we need to make them pay, and a LOT of the blame goes to the OT position-BOTH of them, in my opinion-but some of that goes to Patrick too, as he really wants to get the yards in big chunks. He's going to have to learn to be more patient, and take the short stuff to open up the long stuff. The short stuff is often open, he just looks to the deep routes first and foremost.
And we need to be able to run the ball. There are some schematic issues as well as some individual and group execution issues that are making that not work.
It's still football, and the way it works in real life is still the same; just because you have Patrick Mahomes doesn't mean it's suddenly Madden.
|
But Hill can still beat drop coverages even underneath.
I'm not saying long-term we won't be better off for the approach we're attempting (though I'm not certain we will either; as I've said from the start, this is an experiment and a fascinating one at that).
But we WOULD be 3-0 right now if we had Tyreek Hill on the roster.