Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
Among the best of the best, there are several receiving tight ends who were way better blockers than kelce. Gronk and witten were way better. As receivers it’s hard to argue against Gonzalez or gates. Even today mark Andrew’s and a healthy kittle is a way better blocker. The reason kelce gets overlooked is because it is hard to compare kelce to the all time greats by talking about ability.
I would still take kelce over any of these guys. So why is that? Sometimes it isn’t just pure ability that defines a player.
|
The only person overlooking Kelce here....is you.
As a WR I'd take Gates. That's what you're saying here. Seriously saying that?