Thread: Chiefs 2023 Cap Discussion
View Single Post
Old 11-04-2022, 11:43 AM   #11
dlphg9 dlphg9 is offline
In Search of a Life
 
dlphg9's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2010
Casino cash: $-1610347
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut View Post
Philosophy is one thing - math is another altogether.

They were willing to pay Tyreek until the Adams trade/contract rat-****ed the market. JJSS at 75% of what Hill is getting may be in their price range at that point.

I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I also don't see how, unless you see a TON of improvement from Moore over the course of this season, you can possibly go into next year with a 1-2-3 of MVS - Moore - Toney. That's a pile of shit.

They're gonna pay for somebody. And sooner or later you can't go full GB and just keep cycling out Mahomes weapons. You need a throughput somewhere.
I think the Chiefs want to sign Juju long term, but they definitely have a set price and they won't go above it. Travis Kelce being the same ****ing beast that he is this year helps them as well, since he doesnt seem to have declined at all this year. They could go into next year feeling fine without JJSS returning, because they have Kelce as basically our #1, MVS has shown that he can be at least half way decent. Now all they have to do is hope that Moore or Toney develop into solid WR and get a guy in FA and the draft. If Kelce had shown signs of moderate decline, then you would have to resign JJSS.

I'd also take Mecole on a ~$10 mil/yr contract. You should be able to get him on the same deal as MVS.
Posts: 20,520
dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.dlphg9 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.
    Reply With Quote