Quote:
Originally Posted by Wallcrawler
Why is that hilarious?
If you say things that are correct, obviously you are doing a good job and you are being a good analyst.
Say completely incorrect things, or wildly stupid things, then yes, you're being an idiot.
Great analysts have said some dumb shit over the years. It happens.
It's really okay to call out dumb shit, and approve of good things. It doesn't need to be one way or the other 100% of the time to have credibility.
But who am I kidding, I'm responding to the guy that thought the close of the first half of the Jaguars game was totally fine, and nobody should have had anything negative to say about that shitshow, because we were going to win the game anyway.
I don't expect you to be able to grasp the concept.
|
It's hilarious that you have to be so polar about everything. If any commentator says anything that isn't 100% "Mahomes is great and always in the fight," some of you dipsticks have to scream at clouds, even when just a week ago you were all praising the same guy for his incredibly well-thought out analysis. Just look at yourselves.
It doesn't have to be an either/or. Why is it that when Simms say anything even remotely not in Mahomes' favor, he's automatically "wildly wrong?"
Answer: it's probably that he's not wrong, it's that Chief Fan is unable to grasp any nuanced opinion(s).
And what part of the end of the JAX game are you referring to, just so I know what I'm being accused of. Again.
Had to edit this post. WC isn't pro-Chiefs, he's just pro-Mahomes. Outside of Pat, he hates the coaching staff, the GM, and more than half the players.