And there you go. Case closed.
For a complete reerun with no reading comprehension maybe.
And your take on Andy is stupid, just so you know. Name a HOF coach that was available in 2012 that was better, or would've been as successful. I'll wait.
Please quote where I asked for Reid to be replaced.
Again, poor coaching decisions can be criticized without resorting to full knee jerk FIRE HIM NAOW.
It's okay little buddy. You can criticize questionable calls, bad playcalls, and call full reidtard things full reidtard things and just want those things to be limited, without firing the man. Really.
It's not slobber on Andy's cock, or fire him.
Also, Andy is now the winningest coach in KC history, iirc.
And?
4 straight title game hosts, and one Superbowl win is an understandable "wasted opportunities" situation.
You act as if teams repeatedly host the title game with regularity. They don't. This team was in position 4 years running to establish itself as a dynasty.
Hasn't happened .
But count your wins. I know it worked for us to do that in the Marty Era, because wins>championships amirite?
Just one season with fewer than 10 wins. His second one in KC? So, 8 seasons with more than 10 wins, and well ont he way to another.
7 Divisional titles?
A 57% playoff win% as the HC for KC. 72% in the regular season.
Easy, easy! You'll need Kleenex soon.
4 consecutive AFCCG appearances. Won 2, and lost two through no fault of his own. Unless it's now Andy's fault that Dee Ford lined up offsides.
Oh. So we're just gonna forget about the legendary Andy Reid getting his ass shut out in the first half of that game? Ohhhh. Ok. Gotcha. Games are easier to win if you try to win from the opening kickoff, but hey, regular season wins and division titles.
Or that CJ got called for a bogus RTP call. I know, you think it's Andy's fault that the offense shit the bed in the 2nd half of the AFCCG last season, in spite of every NFL analyst coming to the same exact conclusion, which was that Pat shit the bed.
Sure did call a lot of passes into a 3 man front dropping 8. Coaches are supposed to put their guys in the best position to win. He threw Patrick to the wolves with the Bengals dropping 8 in coverage. Not to mention stepping on his own dick at the end if the half and passing up a sure 14 point lead going into half, he rolled the dice and came away with nothing Brandon Staley style.
But sure, hang it on Patrick, because it suits your narrative that Andy's just this legend who is blameless in his huge losses.
Or that Spags shit the bed in that game because reasons that have nothing to do with reality.
I bagged on spags for the worst 7 game stretch in NFL history defensively. Well earned, well deserved.
And I literally don't have time to go back and search out all your posts shitting on players.
Because they don't ****ing exist. Outside of bagging on Jones for running his mouth in Indy, and doing NOTHING for the rest of the game winning drive, Clyde for being a bag of smashed assholes, or guys hated in general by cp like Mathieu, Sorensen, Nieman, etc.
So yeah, continue to run your mouth about how I shit on half the players without backing it up with anything you ****ing dipshit.
And I shouldn't really have to, after taking apart your arguments against Andy Reid.
You should be able to just spout bullshit claims about things I supposedly said without having to back it up? Yeah okay dipshit. Jesus **** you're unfathomably ****ing reeruned.
How's this for Andy Ried's coaching ability?
After completely tearing down the WR room and filling it with 5 players that have never spent any time in Andy's offense, two of whom came in as rookies, the Chiefs are the no. 1 scoring offense in the league and 2nd in passing yards/gm.
Again. For like the 4th time.
Yeah this all falls in line with Andy being that great coach that gets you a shot at the big game, that most franchises would kill for. I guess you missed that part or your handler skimmed over it and didn't read it to you.
Hopefully translates into another ring. We will see.
On defense the team lost the services of both Hitchens and Mathieu, the defensive play-callers for the last three years, and replaced them with Bolton and Justin Ried, a S that had never played in Spags' defense before, plus three rookies in the starting line up?
IMAGINE BASING AN ARGUMENT ON THE IDEA THAT THE LOSS OF HITCHENS AND MATHIEU WAS ANYTHING BUT ADDITION BY SUBTRACTION. IMAGINE IT.
You've lost your ****ing fingertip grip on reality and descended into an abyss of irreversible ****ing lunacy if you expect ANYONE to believe that those two players leaving was any sort of negative AT ALL.
And somehow Spags defense is top-4 in sacks, ditto QB hurries/hits/pressures or something like that. Top-10 vs. the run, I believe. Yeah, he sux as well, right?
Wait, you mean to tell me that if you add talent to a unit, the unit will perform better?
What a revelation.
Yes, without Sorensen and Nieman trotting out there, with the corpse of Anthony Hitchens and the shell of Tyrann Mathieu, thing are going very well.
And again, none of the things i wrote above are my opinion.
Those are stone cold hard facts, buddy.
I'm actually amazed you can spell fact.
Read 'em and weep.
Oh that was simply amazing. Except for the part where I haven't criticized Spags this year outside of some inexplicable playcalls leaving rookies in single coverage on stud superstar receivers and repeatedly watching them either get roasted or flagged. Or having Josh Allen squirming and flustered at his own 2, and then letting him off the hook on 3rd down.
Again, you can criticize bad plays, bad decisions, without jumping to firing.
You really struggle with this concept.