Quote:
Originally Posted by Just:13
I love when fans make this ridiculous argument. It’s all NFL fans really (including Bills fans).
“Well if X didn’t happen and Y didn’t happen then we would have won (or won bigger).”
It’s ridiculous, because it’s saying “If our teams players didn’t play poorly or get schooled on a route by your teams players, then…”
I mean, that’s the whole point of the game, right? To line up one squad of guys vs another and see who makes more plays and less mistakes.
To say “well if we made less mistakes and played better then…” is so absurd. The Lions would be 8-3 by that logic.
|
Except you are missing the point. In a game where KC beat Buffalo, you said KC got lucky to score in 13 seconds. Based off what you are saying, KC played better than Buffalo.
What you are trying to do though is state that Buffalo played better and dominated KC and KC only won because they were “lucky”. Then using your facts and stats it was shown that indeed it was Buffalo that got lucky. When presented that you spout off the above drivel. You just can’t be consistent and it shows as you seek a narrative to fit your point of view.