View Single Post
Old 12-20-2022, 06:47 PM   #249
Megatron96 Megatron96 is offline
Suupraa Geniuuusss
 
Megatron96's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: North Phoenix, AZ
Casino cash: $-1829600
Quote:
Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger View Post
Another first overall pick, Jared Goff, in his second year had 3800 yards, 28 td's and just 7 picks. The year after he had 4600 yards, 32 td's and 12 picks which took the Rams to the superbowl. And this year guess what? Goff's numbers are virtually the exact same as Lawrence (he has one less TD but more yards and a better qbr) so all I'm saying is people are desperate for Lawrence to become some "qb god" so they can be proven right about their dumb expectations of him from college..but he's not doing anything right now that average qb's today haven't done already. Hell Carson Wentz was way better his second year than Lawrence is right now imo. And his numbers last season are comparable to Lawrence's this year. Lawrence is doing well..I just think he has much more to prove.
Lol, I've never said Trevor could be elite, just better than most. Say somewhere between 10th and 15th. It's only his first year in a new system with Pederson, and he literally has almost no one to throw to, but as you say, he's already playing about as well as two guys that went to the SB.
__________________
“Some ideas are so stupid only intellectuals believe them.”- George Orwell


Steven "Spags" Spagnuolo is my Adopt-A-Chief!!!
Posts: 34,920
Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.Megatron96 is obviously part of the inner Circle.
Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote