Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
You do realize the implication from your initial post was that his falling down had a direct impact on his causing the fumble. As if he fell down in the act of it. That’s what I was disagreeing with.
If you want to claim that his falling down had some impact on the evolution of the play, sure, I acknowledge that. Things happen on every play that alter the course of how things may or may not go.
Do the Chiefs win that game if Clark isn’t on the field for that snap? I don’t think so.
|
If Frank Clark wasn't so bad at football that he'd been fired into the earth's core by Tunsil, they might not win that game.
What's that have to do with Clark's ability as a football player? WAY TO SUCK, FRANK!! Couldn't have done it without ya, bud. Please don't ever improve.
His shittyness had more than a 'direct impact' on the play - it was the play's determining factor. So? Daniel Sorensen made a few plays where he was simply beaten like a rented mule so he was there to punch a football away - doesn't mean he wasn't a bad football player.
And Frank Clark is a bad football player.