Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup
What is the definition you all are using gor a #1 WR? There can be a huge discrepancy in that definition. There are not 32 true #1 WR in the league. Seems most are wanting a top 5 to 10 WR. That is going to be costly when we need a LT and DE more than a #1 WR for starters.
|
Something like top 15. Just guessing, as I haven't bothered to look this season at a ranked list of the top WRs.