Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho
I'm fine either way (not scared of either). But the Bills are the easier matchup at this point, IMO.
They don't have the same offensive firepower (Gabe Davis is just kind of a dude when you don't fall down while covering him). The OLs are similar, but the Bills isn't as good at run blocking.
Allen is more dangerous and dynamic than Burrow, but he's also more likely to make a mistake.
And on D, with Tredavious White clearly not himself and the S spot nicked up and Miller out for the year, I don't think the Bills' D is as good as the Bengals. Weird, right?
|
I prefer Buffalo over Cincinnati to be honest. KC was missing some players and still could have beaten them. They also went out and got Von specifically to beat KC. He is now out for the rest of the year which is a huge loss. KC has shown they can beat Buffalo. Until they prove they can beat Cincinnati I am concerned. They had almost a year to prepare for the Bengals and still lost and the score could have been more lopsided than it ended up being. They are just a bad matchup for KC.