Quote:
Originally Posted by Danguardace
I'd rather keep Hardman, think he'll be Cheaper and along with Moore and Toney gives us a poor man's Legion of Zoom which is better suited to what Pat and Andy want to do.
|
Hmmm.....
I kinda don't think I disagree. And Hardman may be a guy you can get on one of those 'value added' sort of 3 year deals that he has the potential to outplay.
I could absolutely live with a Hardman/Toney/Moore/MVS wide receiver group.
I mean it could implode in spectacular fashion given MVS's inconsistency, Moore's lack of on-field production and injury concerns with both Hardman and Toney - but it could also be similar to those Rams/Martz receiving groups where guys were just flying all over the place.
And with MVS plus a cheaper veteran and/or 2nd/3rd round pick, you can maintain a little size on the roster.
I just think Hardman's skill-set is harder to find and potentially more useful. And he'd likely cost less with greater upside.
Yeah, I think I like this plan.