Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief
The problem is, with Damar stabile and improving they should have finished the game...Period. Do you think if the Bills would have came out and said "We want to try and keep the one seed and keep on a path of our ultimate goal of winning a Superbowl for Damar and the City of Buffalo", that this game wouldn't have resumed Tuesday or Wednesday. They knew it was a tall task down 2 starting Dbacks and were most likely to lose. As others have pointed out, if they were up 24-7 or playing the AZ Cardinals 1 qtr. in, do they choose to resume the game? We know the answer...
|
Literally everyone thinks they should have finished the game. Logistically, it couldn't happen with no slack time available.
I just wish that we, as a fanbase, could at least TRY to be objective about this stuff. All of these are objectively true:
1. The result would have been far more "pure" if they'd played the game. They couldn't.
2. The NFL has rules that should have been used, but those rules absolutely, 100% favored the Chiefs more than any other team. It's BS that they didn't just stick with the rules, but..
3. The Chiefs still came out well ahead here.
I don't understand why we can't just acknowledge that all of those can be true simultaneously.