Quote:
Originally Posted by Direckshun
It's not about 2023.
It's not about 2024.
It's about the next 10 years. And you probably need a better QB for the job.
Fields has gotten the short end of the stick in Chicago, but teams know that. You can probably trade him for a couple nice picks and build around the QB you know gives you the best chance.
I'd trade him, and use to pick to take a QB.
|
It should be, but it is most certainly not. Ever.
Even here, where we have Mahomes, Reid doesn't have 10 years left, that puts him at 74, I don't think he lasts that long.
Veach? Hell there was an argument or two made that Veach should be fired last offseason. No chance he should be looking past more than 3 or 4 years. Dorsey got shitcanned after turning us around after the Scott Franchise Killer Pioli Days.
Who else?
A decade ago you could say Belicheat, but he's over 70 now and won't be around a decade. He sure as shit isn't going to do anything that will set him up for more than 2 years at most.
Newsome in Balt? Maybe.
The crew in Pitt? They're probably the closest.
Nobody else has any slack more than 1-3 years. Especially if shit gets heavy.
We all like to think that we should have a 10 year horizon, but everybody is looking out for #1. And why shouldn't they? Every single franchise has shown that nobody is working out their contract. You either get extended or fired.
The smart money is try to find something that you can do to win with Fields, or convince ownership they need someone new BEFORE you lose them and they want to shitcan your ass.
That's not what we'd like to think but that's the reality of the situation.