Quote:
Originally Posted by dlphg9
Where has the selection committee said that conference tournaments don't matter? They clearly do. KU would have been the #1 overall seed if they either win the Big 12 tourney or if Alabama loses the SEC tournament.
Beating a top 25 team in your conference tournament doesn't increase your resume because it's a win in a conference tournament? That makes no sense. So no tournaments matter for seeding or just the conference one?
Iowa State shouldn't have a higher seed than MU. Say all you want about Ten, but they should not be 3 seeds higher than Missouri. Also Missouri beat Tennessee when they had their PG and they beat Tennessee when they didn't have their PG.
Your saying Texas AM can gripe about there seed because of the way they played in the conf tournament, but the conference tournament doesn't matter. Those ****s had 2 Quad 4 losses. Missouri has much more to complain about than Texas A&M. They lost to Murray State, a team that finished 7th in the MVC and Wofford a team that finished 5th in the Southern. They have no one to blame but themselves.
|
Go the 50 second mark for the committee head's decision to put Houston over Kansas:
A&M went 12-6 vs Quad 1 and 2 teams. Mizzou went 10-9.
A&M (deservedly) was punished for their non-conference schedule even though they had more impressive wins in the SEC and beat the best team in the nation.
Mizzou has some nice wins but no great wins if you're going to argue beating Tennessee doesn't mean shit since Tennessee, per your words, should have had a lower seed than Mizzou.