Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry
Mizzou played a dog shit out of conference schedule and their best win was Tennessee. Kansas and Alabama boat raced them at Mizzou Arena. Mizzou had no bad losses but they didn't have any really good wins either.
For example:
Tennessee beat Kansas, Alabama, and Texas
Iowa State beat Kansas and Texas
You make a case for Mizzou over Kentucky, but Kentucky did play a better OOC schedule and did finish higher in SEC standings 3 vs 4.
Mizzou looks to be seeded about right. They maybe could have been a sixth seed but seventh seems right.
|
They beat the shit out of Iowa St
They beat Tennessee twice
They beat 6 top 25 teams
They finished 4th in the SEC
They finished the season 24-9
No bad losses
They should have been a 5.
San Diego St got a 5 seed. Justify them over MU.
Q1 5-5 (3 wins against Utah St.)
Q2 6-1
Q3 13-0
Q4 2-0
St. Marys got a 5 seed justify them over Mizzou.
Q1 2-3
Q2 7-2
Q3 11-2
Q4 5-0
The fact St. Marys was seeded higher is an absolute joke.
Miami got a 5 and look at that. Mizzou had a better resume.
Q1 5-5
Q2 6-0
Q3 7-1
Q4 7-1
Duke even got a 5 with a worse resume than MU.
Q1 - 5-6
Q2 - 7-2
Q3 - 4-0
Q4 - 10-0
Every single 5 seed had a significantly worse resume than Mizzou. Come on explain how those teams deserved that ranking.
Prison Bitch?
Rams Fan?
Y'all wanna take a shot at bumbling through this explanation?