Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
So effectively the Chiefs trade 31 and 63 (and some late round change) for 35 and 46?
I could talk myself into that. I probably wouldn't go that direction with those two picks, but I like how you managed to get up into a nice spot in the 2nd without too much damage done; just moving down a handful of spots.
Don't like losing the 5th year option but to move up nearly 20 spots in the 2nd, that's a relatively small price to pay.
I like the thought, though.
|
Yes, the sweet spot for value in this draft IMO is around 40-50. So, we didn’t lose much moving back 4 spots from 31-35 other than the 5th year option and the talent at 46 is way better than 63, especially for the DEs that we covet. Getting two players in the top 50 was the goal.