Quote:
Originally Posted by DaFace
Interesting bump. It seems like a lot of AI technologies (driverless cars, ChatGPT, etc.) are able to go from 0% awesome to 95% awesome pretty quickly, but that final 5% is super important yet difficult to achieve.
We've come a long way since this thread in terms of designing cars that can stay in their lanes and not hit anything in front of them, but things are still a little iffy in terms of being able to literally never have an active driver.
I still think we'll get there eventually, but it may still be a bit before we start removing steering wheels from cars.
|
Well, driverless cars carrying passengers are an actual thing in SF without a human driver ready to take over.
I guess you can argue they shouldn't be. Or it's not ready to be deployed by the millions.
I do think some of it will be legal and social. If the standard was just being demonstrably safer than humans it would be one thing, but the standard will be higher than that.
And than as the previously shown article pointed out, they still do occasionally have what might be loosely called common sense problems. Like the best way to navigate construction zones or getting out of the way of emergency vehicles in congested urban environments.