View Single Post
Old 08-29-2023, 08:29 AM   #17
DenverChief DenverChief is offline
Pedantic
 
DenverChief's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Rocky Ford
Casino cash: $3072617
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomBarndtsTwin View Post
Generally, I think the 53 man roster is perfect and keeps things competitive and more talent laden team to team. A lot of the bottom of 53 man rosters (not our team) is nothing more than roster fodder. The league has been diluted enough with expansion, don't want to dilute it even more.

The one reason I might be willing to hear an argument advocating for expanding from 53 to 55 is the 17th game that was added by the owners and eventually the 18th game (we know it's coming) that will be added. That creates more potential injury situations due to a longer season and I can see why teams might want to carry an extra couple players on their active roster. They also need to increase the game day active roster once if/when this 18th game is added to the schedule.
What if we keep it 53 but don’t count the specialists against the roster? Kicker/Punter and Long Snapper.
Posts: 17,051
DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.DenverChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote