Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
Of course that’s his approach at this point. He’s attempting to use the threat of losing games in his absence as leverage to achieve a better contract. It’s not like they’re 20mm/yr apart - it’s probably ~3mm/yr that the Chiefs could certainly make happen but don’t feel they should. Jones hopes that the threat of having a season upended in his absence is enough to wring some concession from the team.
His thought is: lose some money here upfront by missing games but make up for it with a better contract when the defense struggles in his absence and the team caves.
It’s a bold strategy, Cotton.
|
Exactly, if he's going to keep this up, it's really his only play now.