Quote:
Originally Posted by raybec 4
It seems less of an NIL issue and more of a usury issue. I am not sure what they used his name/likeness for to make it an NIL agreement as much as it is just a loan.
|
Usury is difficult to argue when there's no guaranteed return.
But most of the time usury becomes a thing north of 17% or so. Some states are lower but maybe 15%?
I mean you're doubling every 4 years at 17%, give or take. So that 400k becomes 1.75 million by 2030. With no guarantee of any second contract, how can you call it usurious when you may not even get a 15% ROR over the useful life of the deal?
It requires a lot of speculation and contract law LOATHES speculation.