Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief
Your post was not positive, period and you would get slaughtered in a vote. Your post saying "Give it to Pacheco twice, he'll get it in" after Clyde was stuffed, was not positive. It was bitching Clyde got a carry at the goal line. Out of the multiple posts you made in the Gameday thread, that is the only one you even represent as being positive, despite us playing our best 3 quarters of the year. You lose, but it appears you are a welcher and Twisted is giving you an out...
|
Are you honestly expecting ANYONE to go full homer, when CLYDE EDWARDS HELAIRE is called upon to run UP THE MIDDLE on the mother ****ing GOAL LINE, when Isaiah Pacheco has not broken both of his legs and is available to run that play instead?
You're REALLY going to bitch about someone pointing out the hilariously awful personnel choice, and then not freaking out, but simply saying, hey, give it to the right guy here, and we're in? That's what you consider NEGATIVE?
Honestly, just fist yourself. You're obviously ****ed in half upstairs beyond reason, and your fingertip grip on reality has failed, plunging you into an abyss of irreversible stupidity if you think calling for Pacheco to run the football instead of Clyde is a negative.
It's not a negative, it's just simple common ****ing sense.
If shit could shit, it still wouldn't be as shitty as Clyde runs the football. That's fact. Call it whatever you want and I'm sure you, and reeruns like Rasputin who called Clyde " The next Priest Holmes" are rabidly smashing that thumbs down over it, but it changes nothing.
Clyde should NEVER run the football if ANYONE else is conscious and can take a handoff.