Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
Why the hell is it an either/or situation? You don't need to get rid of your elite DT AND CB to get a WR or DT.
|
Changing your argument now. You said not signing Sneed is being "cheap" - whether Sneed is a Chief next year or not, the roster is still going to be 53 players and they are going to spend ~$245million on them. The dumb thing you said is still dumb.
And why is it an either or? Have you heard of the salary cap? When you spend money somewhere, you have less money to spend in other places.
I am also not saying its definitely an either/or. You might be able to retain Sneed and improve at WR and only get a little worse at DT. I just don't think its a dead certainty, if you have to tag Sneed and then the negotiations drag out, you're limiting your ability to make moves in FA.