Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
It's moreso deferring payment rather than taking a discount. But we're splitting hairs here since that same thing can be done with Chris Jones's contract even though they ideally should front load the shit out of it.
|
I would be shocked if Chris Jones will stay in Kansas City. It doesn’t make sense for either party at this point. You brought up Kelce’s deal, but elite tight ends are undervalued. Belichick took advantage of this with Gronk. Chiefs doing the same thing with Kelce. He is just as valuable as the best receivers, but gets paid 50% less than them. And probably over 50% less than Chris Jones when he makes his deal with someone else at more than $30M per year. That big number for an aging player does not make sense for KC.