View Single Post
Old 04-11-2024, 10:14 AM   #337
RunKC RunKC is offline
Andy Reid Supporter
 
RunKC's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $1999611
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut View Post
Ultimately this is why I prefer trade-ups within or into the 2nd round, especially in this draft. You get more 'bang for your buck' in terms of movement and in this draft, I think the talent drop off is both before 32 and around 75. So that's where I'd want to be operating within and can get the most movement in.

If I could maybe move from 32 to 36 and get 106 back from TN, then package that with 95 to get up to say 68, I might consider it.

Now I've turned 32 and 95 into 36 and 68. I'd probably have to throw in that 173 in one of those deals to get it done. Maybe 159 in another though.

I think that would be worth exploring, though I'd probably want something like 227 back from TN and 231 back from NE?

It's doable. And might make sense. But i don't think there are any homeruns to be hit here.
The Packers have 11 total draft picks and 5 in the top 100. That’s one team I think will want to move up due to a myriad of assets. I would be incredibly happy to trade back from 32 to 41 if the tackles we like are gone.

32 for 41 and 91 would be excellent
__________________
Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny
I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs.


Adopt a Chief: Noah Gray
Posts: 46,296
RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.
Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote