Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief
That's not on the insurance company, it's on the employer for choosing that group plan. There are plans that would cover those costs but it would be much more expensive for the employer and most likely lead to less actual pay for all employees while the total benefit package would be similar. Insurance Companies get the blame many times for a policy that has clear exclusions with a reduced cost compared to plans with fewer exclusions.
|
Your argument make some sense...save for this one small problem.
When the company goes "inexpensive" (their term) to "help" defray costs for the associates, but then has no problem paying big yearly bonuses to a specific class of people in the company....that bonus money could actually be utilized to truly defray the costs for the associates.