Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
Get this kid on the morher****ing field man. Damn.
Also..FAU. Good God
|
I'm trying to figure out exactly how to read that graphic.
By a certain way of looking at it, FAU hasn't been bad. The horizontal axis just says how hard the assignment is, right?
Well if the vertical access, which purportedly tracks "production above expected" -- wouldn't the 'expected' take the degree of difficulty into equation? I think that's why so many of those guys are clumped in the middle, otherwise one would think that the left side of the axis full of guys with easy assignments would actually have more guys well above the middle.
What that chart seems to say is that FAU has had a fairly easy go of things thus far but has at least been almost exactly as expected given the relative easy job he's had.
EDIT: No, it's actually even better than that -- by being at the far left of the scale, he's actually drawn some REALLY tough assignments. And so him being at roughly what he's been expected to do against those tough asks is fairly admirable.
Meanwhile Karlaftis is at roughly the same performance rate and has drawn easier assignments, which would explain why he's had more production than FAU.
I think that chart suggests that we're kinda sending FAU out there to die a bit and despite that he's been...okay.