Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
Did you complain when we signed Taylor because you were still pining for Wylie?
Lots of decisions can look better after the fact. The issue at hand is the process the front office took. We didn't have a LT or a RT and they pivoted by signing the highest-rated FA tackle out there. Unless you have some receipts where you claimed it was a terrible idea at the time because Wylie was super competent, I don't understand why it needs to be re-litigated.
Plenty of decisions the organization has made have worked out; plenty of decisions haven't. We judge this team based on Super Bowls, not on an after-the-fact basis of micro-decisions.
And "Jacksonville didn't like Taylor enough..." blah blah. Is this some kind of joke? Are we holding ourselves to the standard of the Jacksonville Jaguars?
|
Think this is the right take. I didn't like Taylor, didn't like the contract, but we needed a guy and he was the best available