Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
Yeah - feels like I'm on about the same page as Seth.
I just don't see how anyone can walk away from that and claim they KNOW what the right answer is. Because I don't see it as being a clear one at all.
Just feels like one where I'm going to defer to Andy. I really cannot draw any obvious conclusions from what we saw Sunday. If you have one issue that you needed to see (i.e. Game Shape) I can see you walking away with a strong opinion. Conversely, if you watched it for 'upside' I can see you having a strong opinion the opposite way -- because when Humphries was locked in, he looked better than Thuney.
It's just going to be a question of risk tolerance.
|
I don't see how anybody could actually WATCH Thuney's reps at LT and think "yeah, that's our best possible outcome".
On a scale of 1 to 100, he's been about a 60. I've watched all the All 22 - he has SIGNIFICANTLY benefited from changes in play calling, something the staff really hasn't done for any of the other LT candidates.
It's pretty easy to tell what the Chiefs want, and it's NOT Joe Thuney at LT.