Quote:
Originally Posted by Balto
I’m surprised so many don’t think a DK could happen. This seems exactly like a Veach move. Has zero to do with Rice and Worthy but replacing Kelce. More so his production.
I believe DK is a Kelce replacement
|
So you think it's a great idea to trade away no less than a 2nd round pick (and it's likely more like at least a 2nd and 3rd round pick) for a WR you're going to owe 18m to this year and have to extend for 30m+ per?
Don't you think Rice + Worthy + Slot WR + Mid-Round Rookie + RB who can contribute to the pass game couldn't take the load off of Kelce?
Let me give you a proposition: Re-sign Hollywood for a year, take WR Isaiah Bond from Texas at 3-66, and RB Bhayshul Tuten from Virginia Tech at 3-95. There are 3 sub-4.4 guys you just added onto the offense. You spent less money and less draft capital than you just sent away for DK Metcalf. In fat, you've saved enough money to probably add a pass rusher like Josh Sweat in FA.
Tell me which is the more complete roster in terms of overall balance and hedged against injury?
Option A: WR Metcalf, WR Rice, WR Worthy, WR Scrub, WR Scrub, WR Remigio, RB Pacheco, RB Scrub, RB Scrub, TE Kelce, TE Gray, TE Wiley
Option B: WR Rice, WR Worthy, WR Brown, WR Bond, WR Scrub, WR Remigio, RB Pacheco, RB Tuten, RB Scrub, TE Kelce, TE Gray, TE Wiley