Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meck
Simmons, yeah-but that's a significant injury.
The rest I'm not sure. I'm really not.
If you're saying that none of these guys are day one ready starters, then I'm not sure they ARE better prospects than Kingsley because Kingsley has 100% of EVERYTHING physically.
I mean, we'll see. But I'm not sure. I think we may be looking at a bunch of guards. And even if not, are any of these guys likely better in 2025 than Kingsley in 2025? Because that's the real question.
And I'm not sure that the BEST thing isn't to bring in a Humphries/Donovan Smith to compete and stick with your initial investment. It was going to take time.
|
Kingsley wasn't even a top 50 player. Conerly isn't making it out of the top 40. Kingsley didn't have great tape against some of the drafts best pass rushers like Conerly does. Just because both guys need some level of development doesn't mean that Conerly isn't objectively the better prospect.