Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
Kingsley wasn't even a top 50 player. Conerly isn't making it out of the top 40. Just because both guys need development doesn't mean that Conerly isn't objectively the better prospect.
|
Well that may be true if you're comparing entering the draft process.
But that's a vacuum that's not current reality.
Does Conerly make KC better in 2025 than Kingsley after a year in the offense?
I don't know that is true.
Maybe Conerly IS a better prospect, but maybe he's top 40 due to lesser comparative talent in THIS draft. That's the conventional wisdom, anyway.
All reports I see would indicate that he's more polished, but less physically able than Kingsley was.
But the key word is 'was'.