Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
It has to. There's just no way they tore that year up AND paid him $30 million. Makes zero sense.
They're dumb -- they're not THAT dumb.
Because of his Pro Bowl this year, his 5th year option would've been more like $18 million instead of our $13 million for McDuffie.
|
So there you’re looking at $27m per year after the first four-year rookie contract for Stingley.
I’d do that without hesitation for McDuffie, and because his fifth year is five million less, you could lump than into the extension to make it look like he’s paid more than Stingley when he really won’t be.