Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
I go back and forth on whether they will take a T at 31. For the last few days, I had been convinced they will.
Now I'm back to thinking they won't. They would've signed a more true stop gap like Humphries or Wills if they wanted to take a T in the 1st, or thought it was likely they will. They went out and got a young guy that they legit think has a shot at being a starting LT.
I think it's more likely that they take a guy on day 2 the more I think about it.
Guess I have to do a new mock again really soon.
|
I just don't love the day 2 OTs very much.
Ersery is the only one I see where I'm like "Yeah, I'd be stoked to get him" and that feels like a bit of a long-shot.
The rest look like OGs to me. There are so many guys listed as OTs in that range that all look like OGs.
I think ultimately I'd just take the board as it comes. I'm not looking to trade up given our lack of capital on Day 3. I'm not interested in trading down as the juice is never worth the squeeze and I think there is enough depth at our need positions (DE and DT, IMO) that we can probably find a contributor in the 2nd if need be.
So just take the best guy on the board regardless of the position. I don't think I'd go RB, but I'd take Burden if he's there at WR. I wouldn't go OG but if the best player is someone like maybe Zabel who might stick at RT and who has very little risk if placed at G, that would be okay.
By and large I'd just take what I have available to me and be pretty pleased.