Quote:
|
Originally Posted by htismaqe
What did KC do exactly against the Broncos, besides take advantage of absolute gifts from the football gods? We didn't complete passes, we didn't protect the QB, we couldn't stop Jake Plummer's COUCH, let alone the entire offense.
The Jags should have success running the ball.
And the Jags won't EVEN COME CLOSE to giving up 200 yards on the ground.
Furthermore, they have Mike Peterson on their defense. Nobody compares, not even KR/PR/WR/RB/S/CB Champ Bailey.
|
Ok, did Denver's defense have anything to do with KC's offensive woes?
Is the KC offense vastly superior to that of the Jags?
Is Taylor on the level of Priest Holmes?
The answers are yes, yes and no.
I've stated their run defense is levels better - I've questioned Denver's offensive success if Q is contained. Did you miss those statements?
I think Denver's defense will hold the Jags from scoring more than 10-13 points. I do believe that Denver can score 13 or more points on Sunday. That's all.
Valiant -
Plummer had success in games against teams other than KC in 2003. They ran misdirection and bootlegs then as well.
Fellas - I'm not predicting the Broncos will romp the Jags 49 - 10. I'm not prediciting this is a SuperBowl bound team. I've admitted that I still question their ability and I realize (even typed it) that they had nice success and a win against a Chiefs' defense that is just as shameful as it was a year ago.
If this is smug, then I'm smug... I think I'm fairly within reason to have confidence and to expect a win against the Jags. I'll be back later on ... carry on.
