[keg in kc]

Originally Posted by rufusmaqe

Well, if that's what you gathered from my post, I apologize. That's not what I intended at all.

Nothing to do with you. I was referring to the guy who said "I think that this is a slap to the face of actors like George Reeves and even Christopher Reeve." I just found that statement pretty humorous with the kind of stuff Reeves and Reeve did.

I am, however, disappointed that an openly gay director has decided to take one of my fondest childhood memories and turn it into a vehicle for advancing his personal and political agenda...

I can't really say anything about that until I see the film. But I don't really care about the director, actor or anybody else being gay. I don't see how that's relevant in any way, unless, as you mention, they have some kind of agenda that in the end ruins the spirit of the source material. But, truth is, I don't imagine that either DC comics or Warner Brothers would allow that. This is a money-making venture first and foremost, and they aren't going to try to alienate any customers.