Quote:
|
Originally Posted by vckcchiefs04
Look, I love our receivers.... but other than what Eddie has done in his time here, and one season when Bo had a few catches with a lot of touchdowns, what have they done? I would not mind a core with a rotation in it. Just an idea here, but what if we were able to have Priest & L.J. in the backfield, Tony G. and Kris Wilson at TE, of course T-Rich at FB, and Kennison at the #1 receiver with a changing rotation of Parker, Michell, Bo, Hall (once in a while), and someone like Morgan or Price to keep the opposing defense guessing what was coming. That is about 7 GOOD options for Trent to throw to on every passing situation. I don't care what defense we are playing against, nobody has enough good defenders to cover that many options of that quality. Why not make the best offense in the league even better?  |
Because we don't need any more guys who can fit into a rotation as 2nd/3rd/4th/5th receivers. If we were talking about a #1 then it would be worth cutting a guy with potential like Craphonso, but we don't need a fresh 7th option. And I'm saying this despite the fact that I was in the camp of those who thought getting a stud WR during the offseason should have been one of the Chiefs top goals. As long as the Chiefs are comfortable with Mitchell, I don't think we want Price or Morgan. If they decide to cut Mitchell, then I'd be in favor of reconsidering that position. I'm afraid that Price is heartless though from what people have said about him, so I'd prefer Morgan if it came to that.