Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Simplex3
This is what I hate about BOTH sides of this coin. He posted it and you act like it's something.
The guy and his church believe a fairly strict set of rules. NO is a city that prides itself on breaking those rules. I didn't hear you guys crying about the fact that these church members were being offended every day that NO did it's thing.
Now the roles are reversed and the church is doing their thing and you guys are all bent out of shape. Hypocrites.
Like a wise comedian once said: "Don't kick a man while he's down? What better time is there to kick a man?"
|
Let me re-educate you to what normal people think I'll do it a simply as possible to work with your username.
1) What NO does does not affect the church in any way. They may not like it but its none of their business.
2) NO is not putting a sign outside of the churchs property saying there is no god this church sucks! Now if they had I would be opposed to that.
3) Its in bad taste no matter how you slice it
Dave
__________________
Thanks, Trump for the civics lesson. We are learning so much about RICO, espionage, sedition, impeachment, the 25th Amendment, order of succession, nepotism, separation of powers, 1st Amendment, obstruction of justice, the emoluments clause, conflicts of interest, collusion, sanctions, oligarchs, money laundering and so much more.
|