Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ISUJeff
htismaqe, phobia - rep. Obviously knowledge, grounded football fans.
But Vailpass, c'mon, you're proving my point about the arrogance. Although I will agree that Iowa probably has an overall more talented team and the reason ISU won was intensity and execution, but you're still saying Iowa's players are 40 points better?
That's like saying Ball St (56 pts, not 40, I know) could have beat Iowa if they had ISU's intensity. Intensity does not make up for 40 points.
Time to accept the fact that ISU has some football players.
|
I said on paper, player by player, position by position, the Hawks look to be superior to the tune of 40 points. I stand by that.
I offered a no-strings-attached congratulations on the victory, which ISU earned.
You have bragging rights for a year due to a very solid performance in the in-state rivalry game.
If you want to be considered an equal ISU will have to earn it by putting together 3-4 years of solid seasons against top-echelon opponents ending in big time bowl games with year-end rankings in the top ten. Until then they are just the same old Clones who have their superbowl against the Hawks then fold the rest of the way.