Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jspchief
My guess is htismaqe is assuming that the players agreed to the renegotiation contingent on there not being a new CBA.
If the team went to players and said "look, due the CBA not getting done, this is the only way we can retain you", and then a CBA did get done, it would be pretty dirty to still expect the players to make concessions.
Now if the basis for restructure was simply "you make too much for your level of play", then I don't think the CBA matters. But I dobt that is the case for these guys.
|
that's convenient ... so the chiefs only have cap room if they
HAVE to have cap room.
if it's optional, we'll just stand pat.